TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

FROM: PLANNING MANAGER WATROUS

SUBJECT: 730 HILARY DRIVE; FILE # 20307

SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, WITH VAIRANCES FOR REDUCED SIDE YARD SETBACK AND EXCESS LOT COVERAGE, AND A FLOOR AREA EXCEPTION (CONTINUED FROM MAY 15, 2003)

MEETING DATE: JUNE 5, 2003

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

Town Planning Division Staff has made a preliminary determination that this proposal would be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as specified in Section 15301.

BACKGROUND

The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to construct additions to an existing two-story single-family dwelling located at 730 Hilary Drive. The original request was to add 1,000 square feet of floor area to the existing house, with additions to both the ground floor and the second floor of the house. The application included requests for a variance for reduced side yard setback; a variance for excess lot coverage; and a floor area exception.

This application was first reviewed at the April 17, 2003 Design Review Board meeting. At that time, the Board raised concerns regarding the overall size of the house that would result from the proposed additions. The Board noted that few homes in Tiburon have been granted both a floor area exception and a variance for excess lot coverage for a home with a two-story design. The Board also noted that the proposed project would result in the second largest house in the neighborhood on the second smallest lot in the vicinity. The Board generally indicated no objections to the request for a reduced side yard setback to continue the line of the existing house.

The Board directed the applicant to revise the design of the proposed additions, and attempt to eliminate the need for the lot coverage variance and/or the floor area exception. The hearing was continued to the May 15, 2003 meeting to allow the applicant time to prepare revised plans for the project.

The applicant submitted revised plans for this application. The size of the proposed addition was reduced from 1,000 square feet to 657 square feet, resulting in a total floor area of 2,780 square feet. The additional lot coverage that would be created by the proposed project was decreased from 1,245 square feet to 1,038 square feet, resulting in a total lot coverage of 2,667 square feet (36.1%). A floor area exception and a variance for excess lot coverage were still requested, as well as a variance for reduced side yard setback.

The Design Review Board reviewed these revised plans at the May 15, 2003 meeting. The majority of the Board could make the findings for the side yard setback variance, but could not make the findings for the floor area exception in combination with the lot coverage variance. The application was continued to the June 5, 2003 Board meeting, with the applicant encouraged to eliminate the need for either the floor area exception and/or the lot overage variance.

The applicant has now submitted further revised plans for this project. The floor area of the proposed additions has been reduced a further 101 square feet to a total of 556 square feet. The resulting proposed floor area for the house would be 2,601 square feet, which would be 17 square feet greater than the 2,584 square foot floor area ratio for a property of this size. The requested increase in lot coverage has been reduced by 19 square feet to 1,019 square feet, resulting in a total lot coverage of 2,648 square feet (35.9%). A floor area exception and a variance for excess lot coverage are still requested, as well as the previously requested variance for reduced side yard setback.

ANALYSIS

Design Issues

As noted in the previous Staff reports for this project, the subject property is located on a relatively level site that is situated, like most others along this side of Hilary Drive, below the level of the street. The revised additions would not appear to intrude into any significant views for the homes located across Hilary Drive.

The general configuration of the proposed additions remains essentially the same as previously submitted. Modifications to the project include the removal of a bedroom on the ground floor, and reductions in size to the proposed office, entry and master bedroom additions.

Zoning

Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds it to be in conformance with the development standards for the R-1 zone with the exception of the previously noted variances for reduced side yard setback and excess lot coverage, and the requested floor area exception.

Variances

As the revised applications still result in the same variances requested for the previous iterations of the project (albeit with a slightly smaller requested lot coverage), the analysis of the findings required to approve these variances remains the same as described in the previous Staff reports for this application. In summary, the Design Review Board has approved a number of variances (primarily in the Bel Aire neighborhood) for excess lot coverage on smaller single-family lots as a tradeoff for maintaining a single-story building profile, but not for applications that involve excess lot coverage created, in part, by a two-story addition to a two-story house, as in this application. In addition, the strict application of the maximum allowable lot coverage would still allow the property owner to construct additional floor area on the site without exceeding the floor area ratio for this property, and therefore would not result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship on the applicant. Staff still believes that there is sufficient evidence to support the findings for the requested variance for reduced side yard setback, but there appears to be insufficient evidence to support the findings for the requested variance for excess lot coverage.

Floor Area Exception

As noted in prior Staff reports for this application, it appears that the Design Review Board may make the required findings to grant the requested exception to the required floor area ratio requirements. The construction of additions to the front of the house in line with the existing structure would not significantly alter the visual size and scale of the house when viewed from other homes in the vicinity. The proposed additions would also not alter the relationship of the structure with the physical layout of the site.

The currently requested 2,601 square foot floor area for the house would be only 17 square feet (0.7%) above the maximum floor area permitted for a lot of this size. A table was previously prepared that compared the lot size, floor area ratio and proposed floor area of the proposed project with other properties in the vicinity. Despite the reduction in size from the previous applications, the currently proposed design would still result in the second largest house in the neighborhood on the second smallest lot in the vicinity.

The direction given by the Design Review Board at the previous hearings regarding this application was to attempt to eliminate either or both the requests for a lot coverage variance and floor are exception; although smaller in scope, the current proposal still involves both of these requests. Staff recommends that the Board again consider whether an application that would be inconsistent with the development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, and exceeds the zoning requirements for both floor area and lot coverage for a lot smaller than most in the vicinity, would result in an overbuilt property and an inappropriate level of development for a single-family neighborhood. If the necessary findings for the requested variances can be made, the Board may also consider approval of the project with an added condition of approval requiring compliance with the floor area ratio for this property, via a reduction of 17 square feet from the floor area of the project.

Public Comment

Five letters were previously received from surrounding property owners (at 720, 725, 740 & 750 Hilary Drive and 735 Hawthorne Drive) in support of the proposed project. No letters have been received since the May 15, 2003 Board meeting.

RECOMMENDATION

The Board should review this project with respect to Zoning Ordinance Sections 4.02.07 (Guiding Principles) and determine that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as specified in Section 15301. If the Board agrees with Staff’s conclusions, it is recommended that the Board deny the subject application or direct the applicant to make the modifications to address the concerns described above. If the Board wishes to approve the project, the necessary findings should be made, and Staff would recommend that the attached conditions of approval be applied.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Conditions of approval

2. Table Comparing Lot Sizes, Floor Area Ratios and Floor Areas in the Vicinity of 730 Hilary Drive

3. Design Review Board Staff Report dated April 17, 2003

4. Design Review Board Staff Report dated May 15, 2003

5. Minutes of the April 17, 2003 Design Review Board meeting

6. Draft Minutes of the May 15, 2003 Design Review Board meeting

7. Revised supplemental materials

8. Revised plans

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

730 HILARY DRIVE

FILE #20307 

1. This approval shall be used within three (3) years of the approval date, and shall become null and void unless a building permit has been issued.

2. The development of this project shall conform with the application dated by the Town of Tiburon on February 18, 2003, or as amended by these conditions of approval. Any modifications to the plans of May 27, 2003, must be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board.

3.    Plans submitted to the Building Division for plan check shall be identical to those approved by the Design Review Board. If any changes are made to the approved Design Review plans, the permit holder is responsible for clearly identifying all such changes when submitted to the Building Division for plan check. Such changes must be clearly highlighted (with a "bubble" or "cloud") on the submitted plans. A list describing in detail all such changes shall be submitted and attached to the building plans, with a signature block to be signed by the Planning Division Staff member indicating that these changes have been reviewed and are approved, or require additional Design Review. All changes that have not been explicitly approved by Staff as part of the Building Plan Check process are not approved. Construction that does not have Planning Division approval is not valid and shall be subject to stop work orders and may require removal.

4.    The applicant must meet all requirements of other agencies prior to the issuance of a building permit for this project.

5.    All skylights shall be bronzed or tinted and no lights shall be placed in the wells.

6.    All exterior lighting fixtures must be down light type fixtures.

COMPARISON OF LOT SIZES, FLOOR AREA RATIOS AND

FLOOR AREAS IN THE VICINITY OF 730 HILARY DRIVE

Lot Floor Area Floor

Size Ratio Area

Address (S.F.) (S.F.) (S.F.)

700 Hilary Drive

8,700

2,870

1,733

705 Hilary Drive

8,063

2,806

1,553

710 Hilary Drive

8,505

2,851

1,889

715 Hilary Drive

8,119

2,820

1,439

720 Hilary Drive

7,129

2,495

1,635

725 Hilary Drive

7,680

2,768

1,153

735 Hilary Drive

7,729

2,773

1,533

740 Hilary Drive

8,400

2,840

1,153

745 Hilary Drive

7,740

2,740

1,453

750 Hilary Drive

9,163

2,916

1,153

700 Hawthorne Drive

8,730

2,873

1,747

705 Hawthorne Drive

7,477

2,617

1,283

710 Hawthorne Drive

11,187

3,119

1,923

711 Hawthorne Drive

7,391

2,587

1,465

725 Hawthorne Drive

7,391

2,587

1,511

730 Hawthorne Drive

23,040

4,304

2,330

735 Hawthorne Drive

7,560

2,756

1,260

757 Hawthorne Drive

18,820

3,882

3,773

 730 Hilary Drive 7,382 2,584 2,601

(Proposed)